Skip to content
Safety

Experts adopt AI agent's random opinions and think they're their own, Anthropic study finds.

The DecoderIndependent reporting·
AI brief

Anthropic gave 50 experts an AI agent whose preferences were set by coin toss; the experts followed the agent's view up to 86 percent of the time on judgment calls, and most believed the conclusions were their own.

Why it matters: It suggests people can treat an AI agent's arbitrary outputs as their own judgments, even when the agent's preferences have no substantive basis.

Written by AI from The Decoder's published text.

Background

From our own funding, model and news trackers, not from the source.

Source

“Anthropic gave 50 experts an AI agent whose preferences were set by coin toss. The experts followed the agent's view up to 86 percent of the time on judgment calls, and most believed the conclusions were their own.”
The Decoder, 29 Oct 2026, 19:33.

Reporting from a publisher outside the organisation being covered.

Read original story ↗