Skip to content
Archive

AI news archive.

4,965 articles filed under Agents, newest first, from the outlets listed on the sources page.

All topicsModelsAgentsResearchChips and computeOpen sourceSafetyPolicy and regulationStartups and fundingCommunityQuantum
  1. arXiv cs.AIagents
    OntoAct: Hypothesis-Based Neuro-Symbolic Agents through Ontological Abstraction

    arXiv:2610.21983v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning from experience requires recovering reusable knowledge and determining when it applies to a new situation. We introduce OntoAct, a hypothesis-based neuro-symbolic…

  2. arXiv cs.AIagents
    CARA: Causally Guided Retrieval Agent for Question Answering

    arXiv:2610.22017v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation over text-rich knowledge graphs requires identifying evidence that contributes to answering a question, rather than merely matching its textu…

  3. arXiv cs.AIagents
    GraphACM: Graph-based Action Consistency Measurement for Uncertainty Quantification in LLM Agents

    arXiv:2610.22031v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Behavioral consistency across repeated executions provides an informative signal for assessing the reliability of large language model (LLM) agents. However, existing appro…

  4. arXiv cs.AIagents
    FAOPs: Normal Forms and an Algebra for AI Agent Workflows

    arXiv:2610.22061v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Organizations increasingly encode operational procedures as multi-step agent skills, here called Agent Operating Procedures (AOPs), that must be traceable, auditable, repro…

  5. arXiv cs.AIagents
    PROBE: Learning to Audit Policy Compliance in Tool-Using LLM Agents

    arXiv:2610.22124v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern agentic systems extend language models with external tools, enabling them to complete complex tasks through multi-turn interactions. As these agents are deployed in…

  6. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Believed but Not Said: Measuring Hidden Belief Collapse in Multi-Agent LLM Discussions

    arXiv:2610.22138v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM systems increasingly rely on groups of agents that discuss, critique, and check one another, assuming that peers will catch individual errors. We test this assumption a…

  7. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Realtime-Bench: Can Frontier Models Solve Real-time Interactive Problems?

    arXiv:2610.22155v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Real-time interaction requires agents to perceive evolving environments and act under temporal constraints, yet existing evaluations of real-time streaming models focus…

  8. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Terminal-RSI: Recursive Self-Improving Terminal Agents via Recursive Self-Rewrite and Policy-Refine

    arXiv:2610.22192v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Converting verifier outcomes into useful policy updates and partial progress into complete task resolution is crucial for terminal agents. We present Terminal-RSI, whic…

  9. arXiv cs.AIagents
    AutoSFT: An Agentic System for Automated Data Research in Supervised Fine-Tuning

    arXiv:2610.22194v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language model agents increasingly automate post-training, but when given the full training stack they converge on supervised fine-tuning and spend most effort revising tra…

  10. arXiv cs.AIagents
    HTN-Orchestrate: A Hierarchical Task Network Framework for Multi-Agent Orchestration

    arXiv:2610.22195v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Orchestrating multiple agents on a complex task requires reconciling local subtask execution with global task planning. Dynamic dispatch approaches provide execution fl…

  11. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Shortcut Sensitivity in Agent-Safety Evaluations

    arXiv:2610.22243v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents take actions through tools. Some actions are sensitive, so guards that supervise them must themselves be evaluated reliably. Yet the data used to evaluate a guard…

  12. arXiv cs.AIagents
    X-RIC: An Agentic RAN-Intelligent Controller Benchmark for Enhancing Reinforcement Learning

    arXiv:2610.22269v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The O-RAN ALLIANCE introduces architectural flexibility through disaggregation and AI-driven control. While the RAN Intelligent Controller (RIC) enables centralized optimiz…

  13. arXiv cs.AIagents
    LEASH: Uncertainty-Aware Weak-to-Strong Escalation and Oversight for Computer-Use Agents

    arXiv:2610.22280v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Computer-use agents increasingly tackle long-horizon tasks, where running a frontier model at every step is expensive and a small open-weight model alone often fails. Weak-…

  14. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Improving Environment-Agnostic Agents: The Role of Scaffolding

    arXiv:2610.22289v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Agents built on stronger language models may increasingly construct useful procedures for themselves, reducing the advantage of developer-supplied scaffolding. We inves…

  15. arXiv cs.AIagents
    A team of Gemini 4 Argon agents beats Minecraft

    arXiv:2610.22319v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We placed four Gemini 4 Argon agents in a sandboxed Minecraft survival world and gave them one goal: defeat the Ender Dragon. Each agent controlled a player via an open-sou…

  16. arXiv cs.AIagents
    KnowGPO: Knowledge-Grouped Policy Optimization for Search Agents

    arXiv:2610.22331v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep search agents solve knowledge-intensive tasks through long-horizon, multi-turn interactions, where assigning credit to individual search decisions is fundamentally dif…

  17. arXiv cs.AIagents
    MLExpert: Towards a Generalist Agentic Model for Autonomous Machine Learning Engineering

    arXiv:2610.22344v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are expanding from assisting scientific research and engineering to autonomously developing and improving AI systems, advancing AI for AI (AI4A…

  18. arXiv cs.AIagents
    FDE-Gym: The Last Mile of AI Delivery

    arXiv:2610.22350v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing agent benchmarks typically evaluate agents on well-specified tasks defined by issue reports, specifications, or task tickets. Real-world customer delivery is diffe…

  19. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Truth for Believable AI: Expressed Doubt, Provenance, and Belief Revision as an Engineerable Stance

    arXiv:2609.26035v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Conversational agents often express answers in a uniformly confident register. We test whether expressed uncertainty, provenance-aware assertion, and explicit belief revi…

  20. arXiv cs.AIagents
    RICE-Alpha: Reliability-Informed Correction with Event Graphs for LLM-Agent Stock Forecasting

    arXiv:2609.34004v2 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Equity-relevant news evolves through temporally dependent corporate events, making historical information useful only when event continuity, information availability, and…

  21. arXiv cs.AIagents
    INFUSE: A Unified Surface Benchmark for Indirect Prompt Injection in Agentic Systems

    arXiv:2610.20776v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based agents increasingly execute long-horizon, end-to-end workflows involving shell commands, code modification, dependency installation, and interaction with remote…

  22. arXiv cs.AIagents
    SHRED: Self-Play for Heterogeneous Road-Users without Expert Demonstrations

    arXiv:2610.20866v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Realistic traffic simulation and autonomous planning both depend on modeling interactions among heterogeneous road users whose dynamics, constraints, and behaviors differ…

  23. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Screwtape: Adversarial Transcript Editing for Monitor Red-Teaming

    arXiv:2610.20941v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present Screwtape, a pipeline that converts real agent transcripts into attacks that evade action-only monitors. An LLM attacker edits a transcript so that the agent c…

  24. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Same Context, Different Agents: A Behavioral Study of Semantic Layers, Multi-Agent Orchestration and Memory Compaction in Data Agents

    arXiv:2610.20959v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Answering questions over heterogeneous data means combining evidence from files, databases, documents and the web. Data agents automate this, but their success de…

  25. arXiv cs.AIagents
    SCARCE: Emergent Institutions in Long-Horizon Multi-Agent Coding Systems

    arXiv:2610.21029v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As autonomous agents become widely deployed, coordinating access to shared computing resources and services will become increasingly important. Recent incidents h…

  26. arXiv cs.AIagents
    ReviewPilot: A Multi-Agent System for Screening and Data Extraction in Systematic Reviews

    arXiv:2610.21042v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Systematic literature reviews follow the PRISMA process of screening scholarly works and extracting evidence from included studies. Deep research tools based on large lan…

  27. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Approve What, Exactly? Effect Binding and Trusted Rendering for Agent Step-Up Authorization

    arXiv:2610.21063v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI agents now pause for approval before they send money, delete files or email outsiders, and that approval is usually treated as a second factor. We argue it is one only…

  28. arXiv cs.AIagents
    ToolBottleneckBench: Measuring Tool-Agent Performance under Controlled Pressures and Fixed Harness Budgets

    arXiv:2610.21098v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The success score of a tool agent reflects both its model and the budgets of the harness that runs it. We present ToolBottleneckBench, a benchmark that measures tool-agen…

  29. arXiv cs.AIagents
    SSR: Structural Signal Retriever for Scalable Agent Discovery in LLM-Orchestrated Multi-Agent Systems

    arXiv:2610.21113v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large-scale multi-agent ecosystems require mechanisms for discovering suitable agents without exposing entire registries to a large language model (LLM) orchestrator. The…

  30. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Stronger Judges Do Not See More: Deployment-Integrity Blindness in LLM Evaluation

    arXiv:2610.21135v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-agent evaluation reports behavioral scores but leaves the identity of the deployed runtime stack unreported. A tampered deployment that preserves evaluated outputs pa…

  31. arXiv cs.AIagents
    A Responsibility-Centered Coordination Mechanism for Decentralized Multi-Agent Systems

    arXiv:2610.21243v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Centralized orchestration provides comprehensive multi-agent coordination but creates bottlenecks in scalability, adaptability, and collective performance. Decentralized…

  32. arXiv cs.AIagents
    TRACER: Trajectory-Aware Tool Retrieval for LLM Agents

    arXiv:2610.21267v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern agents select tools from registries, but exposing entire registries incurs high token costs and can impair selection as they grow. We present TRACER, a retrieval f…

  33. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Memorilla: Latent Semantic Memory for LLMs

    arXiv:2610.21375v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Memory enables large language models (LLMs) to use information beyond their parameters, such as past user conversations, long documents, or an agent's earlier act…

  34. arXiv cs.AIagents
    PriorityFEC: Deadline-Aware Streaming FEC for KV-Cache Handoff in Edge Multi-Agent Systems

    arXiv:2610.21390v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems are increasingly deployed at the edge to support complex tasks that require collaboration and information exchange…

  35. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Matoi: Selective Revalidation of Consequence Evidence for Agent Authorization

    arXiv:2610.21394v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Matoi separates reusable consequence evidence from current execution authority and durable occurrence history. Its finite query-aware contract covers branches, ordered co…

  36. arXiv cs.AIagents
    X-Fly: Learning to Reach and Stop in Full-Chunk Aerial Vision-Language Navigation

    arXiv:2610.21450v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Aerial vision-language navigation (VLN) agents built on large vision-language models are expensive to query. Executing a complete predicted action chunk before replanning…

  37. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Trajectory-Level Speculation with Semantic Verification for Tool-Using Agents

    arXiv:2610.21463v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model agents solve tasks through long sequences of tool calls, and the prevailing design has a single strong model generate every step, although many steps…

  38. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Poison Valleys: Diagnosing Path-Dependent Failure in LLM Code Repair

    arXiv:2610.21514v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When code-repair agents fail, final tests reveal that a patch is wrong but not which earlier commitment caused it or which software obligation failed. Poison Valleys trac…

  39. arXiv cs.AIagents
    DialFork: Going Beyond Factuality to Evaluate Procedural Hallucination in Conversational Agents

    arXiv:2610.21561v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) deployed as conversational agents are increasingly expected to follow procedural logic. While factual hallucination has received exte…

  40. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Independent Data-Integrity Verification for LLM-Driven Functional Coverage Closure in Hardware Design

    arXiv:2610.21570v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM agents can write directed tests that close functional coverage, but coverage only shows that a state was reached, not that the data on the way there was correct. This…

  41. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Rethinking the Role of Tool Graph Memory in Multi-Turn Tool Use

    arXiv:2610.21571v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents solve complex tasks by calling external tools over multiple turns. Recent work has proposed tool graph memory, which stores past experie…

  42. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Human Interventions as Labels: Localizing, Steering, and (Sometimes) Editing the Computations Behind LLM Agent Failures

    arXiv:2610.21708v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When an LLM agent misbehaves, a human steps in, and that intervention is usually discarded or replayed as training data. We treat it instead as a measurement: a label poi…

  43. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Reliable Knowledge Acquisition for Continual Learning Agents

    arXiv:2610.21739v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As agents powered by foundation models move into open-ended environments, continual learning from experience becomes essential. For agents built on models with fixed para…

  44. arXiv cs.AIagents
    The Delegation Dilemma: Economies of Scale, Accountability, and Polycentric Governance

    arXiv:2610.21746v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many collective-action systems are neither fully decentralized nor fully centralized: agents voluntarily organize into institutions that share organizational costs and de…

  45. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Learning Rewards in Strategic Games

    arXiv:2610.21912v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding the objectives that drive agents' behavior is crucial in strategic environments, where multiple agents interact and adapt to one another. This challenge ari…

  46. arXiv cs.AIagents
    CodeHealth Predicts the Token Cost of Agentic Code Review: A Pre-Registered Study of 465 Agent-Authored Pull Requests

    arXiv:2610.21914v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Context: Organizations increasingly delegate code review to multi-agent large language model (LLM) pipelines billed per token. Low code quality raises human maintenance e…

  47. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Agentic-Priors: Using Large Language Models to Address the Cold Start Problem in Preference Elicitation

    arXiv:2610.21938v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: An agent that learns a user's preferences from their choices faces a cold start problem: before any choices are observed, it must rely solely on a prior. Informative prio…

  48. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Priming Base Models for Agentic Post-Training: An Open Midtraining Recipe

    arXiv:2610.22019v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Frontier models, general-purpose and domain-specific alike, now include a midtraining stage between pretraining and post-training, but little has been published about how…

  49. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Selection Is Not Learning: Choosing Model Futures

    arXiv:2610.22029v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Self-evolving language models train on tasks they generate, so every round must decide which updated model the next round inherits. Current loops such as R-Zero, Agent0,…

  50. arXiv cs.AIagents
    Specification Gaming and a Constrained Reinforcement Learning Mitigation in a Cleaning Gridworld

    arXiv:2610.22152v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning agents optimize exactly the reward signal they are given, which can diverge sharply from an intended true objective when that signal is only a prox…