AI brief
A LessWrong post argues that verification mechanisms are unlikely to stop training runs from being chained together or aggregated in parallel, a practice the author calls weight smuggling, making it hard to enforce caps on FLOPs per training run.
Why it matters: It suggests that compute-based limits on individual training runs, a common proposal for controlling advanced AI development, may be difficult to verify or enforce in practice.
Written by AI from LessWrong's published text.
Source
“Epistemic status: >90% confidence in the principle, >70% confidence that mitigating these would be hard in practice, no full implementation yet.”
Interpretation or community commentary rather than straight reporting.
Read original story ↗