Skip to content
Policy and regulation

Weight smuggling likely defeats attempts to cap FLOPs per training run.

LessWrongAnalysis or commentary·
AI brief

A LessWrong post argues that verification mechanisms are unlikely to stop training runs from being chained together or aggregated in parallel, a practice the author calls weight smuggling, making it hard to enforce caps on FLOPs per training run.

Why it matters: It suggests that compute-based limits on individual training runs, a common proposal for controlling advanced AI development, may be difficult to verify or enforce in practice.

Written by AI from LessWrong's published text.

Source

“Epistemic status: >90% confidence in the principle, >70% confidence that mitigating these would be hard in practice, no full implementation yet.”
LessWrong, 21 Sept 2026, 14:50.

Interpretation or community commentary rather than straight reporting.

Read original story ↗