AI brief
Writing on Simon Willison's weblog, Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt and Qing Wang argue that "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for asking what could go wrong with a change and which check, automated or human, should catch it. They say asking that question also changed when review happens.
Written by AI from Simon Willison's Weblog's published text.
Source
“We think "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for "what could go wrong with this change, and which check—automated or human—is the right one to catch it?" Asking that question also changed when review happens.”
Interpretation or community commentary rather than straight reporting.
Read original story ↗